![]() ![]() The CIA's Inspector General, however, contradicted Mr. He told the Council of Foreign Relations that the CIA would never do such a thing. In 2014, for example, he denied to Congress that CIA officials under his supervision had improperly accessed the computer files of congressional staffers. Brennan has a history that calls into question his objectivity and credibility. Second, that conduct and behavior has tested and far exceeded the limits of any professional courtesy that may have been due to him. Brennan are now outweighed by the risks posed by his erratic conduct and behavior. First, at this point in my administration, any benefits that senior officials might glean from consultations with Mr. Brennan's continued access to classified information. Neither of these justifications supports Mr. Historically, former heads of intelligence and law enforcement agencies have been allowed to retain access to classified information after their Government service so that they can consult with their successors regarding matters about which they may have special insights and as a professional courtesy. Today, in fulfilling that responsibility, I have decided to revoke the security clearance of John Brennan, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). While Mueller ultimately found questionable ties between Trump's campaign and Russia, he concluded there was not sufficient evidence to pursue criminal charges.ĭemocrats have lambasted the Durham probe as politically motivated, but the Biden administration has not stopped it.ĭurham's probe has already indicted a cybersecurity lawyer accused of making a false statement to the FBI and an FBI lawyer who admitted to altering an email.As the head of the executive branch and Commander in Chief, I have a unique, Constitutional responsibility to protect the Nation's classified information, including by controlling access to it. He pointed to the dossier, some of which remains uncorroborated or has been discredited, as evidence of a tainted probe driven by Democrats.īut the dossier had no role in the launching of the FBI's Trump-Russia investigation, which was placed in the hands of special counsel Robert Mueller. Trump claimed the investigation of campaign ties to Russia was a witch hunt. Under Trump, the Justice Department appointed Durham to carry out an investigation into the dossier. ![]() To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video What is behind the investigations? The dossier was ultimately used by the FBI as it applied for and received surveillance warrants targeting a former Trump campaign aide.ĭanchenko allegedly lied about the source of information included in the so-called "Steele dossier" when questioned about his work, the Justice Department stated.ĭanchenko is the third person, and second in a two-month span, to face charges related to the dossier.Ĭombating election interference | GMF compact What did Igor Danchenko do?ĭanchenko functioned as a source for Christopher Steele, a former British spy who was paid by Democrats to compile the dossier into links between Russia and Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign. The dossier and the Durham probe have faced accusations that they are politically motivated. Igor Danchenko is facing charges of providing false statements to the FBI as part of special counsel John Durham's ongoing investigation. US authorities have arrested a Russia analyst who provided information for a Democrat-funded dossier on former President Donald Trump's ties to Russia during the 2016 US presidential election, the US Justice Department said Thursday.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |